METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO ASSESSING CORPORATE REPUTATION AND ECONOMIC SECURITY OF ENTERPRISES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36690/2674-5208-2025-3-106-118

Keywords:

corporate reputation, economic security, stakeholder-oriented assessment, reputation indices, media and content analysis, social-media analytics, reputation audit, economic-impact analysis, ESG, multidisciplinary approach

Abstract

This article systematizes methodological approaches to assessing the economic security of enterprises and their corporate reputation, treating reputation as a multidimensional, stakeholder-oriented intangible asset that shapes performance, consumer behavior, and competitive positioning. The aim of the article is to synthesize core approaches and conceptual foundations of reputation assessment and to organize practical methods and limitations into a coherent, decision-useful framework. Methodologically, the study integrates stakeholder-centered perspectives with quantitative and qualitative indicators, multidisciplinary lenses (management, marketing, social psychology), and sensitivity to the dynamic, evolving character of reputation. It summarizes sector-specific contingencies and consolidates principal methods - reputation indices and rankings, stakeholder surveys and interviews, media and content analysis (including sentiment and thematic analysis), social-media and digital analytics, reputation audits, and economic-impact analysis - highlighting their complementary roles in benchmarking, real-time monitoring, internal diagnostics, and financial linkage. The main results include a structured conceptual basis for reputation evaluation; a systematization of theoretical frameworks (stakeholder theory, resource-based view, social identity theory, signaling theory) and their instruments; and a synthesis of key challenges such as subjectivity and bias, data quality and availability, the dynamic and context-specific nature of reputation, and the integration of digital with traditional metrics. The conclusion underscores the need for adaptive, context-dependent methodologies that triangulate multiple data sources, employ longitudinal and event-based designs, and leverage real-time analytics to capture inflection points. The perspectives emphasize continuous refinement to integrate ESG considerations, tailor indicators to industry conditions, and apply advanced diagnostics for early-warning detection - thereby enabling organizations to sustain and enhance reputational capital in an interconnected environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Igor Korzhevskyi, LTD «Risk-Control»

Ph..D. (Management), Director, LTD «Risk-Control», Kyiv

References

Aaker, D. A. (1996). Building strong brands. The Free Press. https://irp.cdn-website.com/e38aeb7a/files/uploaded/%5BM%5DDavid_A._Aaker_Building_Strong_Brands.pdf

Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079

Barnett, M. L., Jermier, J. M., & Lafferty, B. A. (2006). Corporate reputation: The definitional landscape. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550012

Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Culnan, Mary J.; McHugh, Patrick J.; and Zubillaga, Jesus I. (2010) "How Large U.S. Companies Can Use Twitter and Other Social Media to Gain Business Value," MIS Quarterly Executive: Vol. 9: Iss. 4, Article 6. Available at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/misqe/vol9/iss4/6

Deephouse, D. L. (2000). Media Reputation as a Strategic Resource: An Integration of Mass Communication and Resource-Based Theories. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1091-1112. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600602

Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984

Einwiller, S. A., Carroll, C. E., & Korn, K. (2010). Under what conditions do the news media influence corporate reputation? The roles of media dependency and need for orientation. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(4), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2009.28

Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). McGraw–Hill. https://shorturl.at/05XEm

Fombrun, C. J., & van Riel, C. B. M. (2004). Fame and fortune: How successful companies build winning reputations. Pearson/Financial Times. https://shorturl.at/jF1jQ

Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N. A., & Sever, J. M. (2000). The Reputation Quotient℠: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. Journal of Brand Management, 7(4), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540129

Fortune & Korn Ferry. (2025). World’s Most Admired Companies – methodology overview. (Опис дев’яти атрибутів та вибірки). https://shorturl.at/MI5Gp

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman. (Reissued by Cambridge University Press, 2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192675

Gardberg, N. A., & Fombrun, C. J. (2006). Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.20208684

Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299305700101

Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005

Korzhevskyi, I., & Mihus, I. (2022). Business reputation of enterprises: definitions, structure and reputation risk management. Economics, Finance and Management Review, (3), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.36690/2674-5208-2022-3-89

Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1580441

Luo, X., Zhang, J., & Duan, W. (2013). Social media and firm equity value. Information Systems Research, 24(1), 146–163. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0462

Reichheld, F. F. (2003). The one number you need to grow. Harvard Business Review, 81(12), 46–54. https://hbr.org/2003/12/the-one-number-you-need-to-grow

Rindova, V. P., Petkova, A. P., & Kotha, S. (2007). Standing out: How new firms in emerging markets build reputation in the media. Strategic Organization, 5(1), 31–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127006074389

Rindova, V. P., Pollock, T. G., & Hayward, M. L. A. (2006). Celebrity firms: The social construction of market popularity. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 50–71. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.19379624

Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1077–1093. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3094296

Schultz, M., Mouritsen, J., & Gabrielsen, G. (2001). Sticky reputation: Analyzing a ranking system. Corporate Reputation Review, 4(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540130

Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(05)37005-5

Whetten, D. A., & Mackey, A. (2002). A Social Actor Conception of Organizational Identity and Its Implications for the Study of Organizational Reputation. Business & Society, 41(4), 393-414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650302238775

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Korzhevskyi, I. (2025). METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO ASSESSING CORPORATE REPUTATION AND ECONOMIC SECURITY OF ENTERPRISES. Economics, Finance and Management Review, (3(23), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.36690/2674-5208-2025-3-106-118

Issue

Section

Chapter 3. Modern management technologies