INNOVATIVE MANAGEMENT OF CULTURAL, EDUCATIONAL AND SCIENTIFIC PROJECTS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: ECONOMIC TOOLS AND MARKETING STRATEGIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36690/2733-2039-2025-2-33-43Keywords:
public administration, scientific communication, digital transformation, cross-sectoral partnership, cultural projects, scientific projects, education, strategy, innovation managementAbstract
In the context of rapid digitalization and global challenges of today, cultural and scientific projects are becoming key instruments of social development, national identity formation, and cultural, educational, and scientific diplomacy. The study examines innovative management as an effective management model that enhances the effectiveness of promoting such projects in the public sector. The aim of the work is to identify effective economic tools and digital marketing strategies that can be integrated into the process of managing cultural and educational-scientific initiatives. The object of analysis was government programs, institutional models, and communication practices in the public sector in five countries: Sweden, Germany, South Korea, Brazil, and Canada. The study used methods of content analysis of official documents and digital platforms, case studies of successful initiatives, as well as elements of comparative analysis and interpretation of public management and administration practices. The theoretical basis was formed by the concepts of open innovation, disruptive thinking, cultural economy, and project management. The main mechanisms of economic support (from budget financing to social investments) used in more than 30 national programs were studied. An analysis of nearly 100 cases of digital communication showed that the most popular communication channels are Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok, which together attract more than 60% of the target audience. Projects in the fields of culture, education, and science were examined, such as KunstDigital, AI & Culture Lab, and ScienceStories EU, confirming the effectiveness of combining VR/AR, NFT, artificial intelligence, and influencer marketing in promoting non-commercial projects. The novelty of the research lies in the combination of quantitative analysis of digital channels, qualitative case studies, and evaluation of financial instruments, which until now have been considered fragmentarily in the scientific literature. The practical value of the results lies in the possibility of applying the developed model in the formation of state strategies for digital transformation in the fields of education, culture, and science, the development of innovation support programs, and the evaluation of the effectiveness of mixed marketing strategies in working with target audiences in the field of public administration.
Downloads
References
Bessant, J., & Tidd, J. (2015). Innovation and entrepreneurship (3rd ed.). Wiley.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press.
Chhabra, N. K., & Chaturvedi, D. D. (2022). Use of social media in arts marketing: A literature review. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 3(1), 559–565. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v3.i1.2022.225
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business Review Press.
Creative Europe Project Results. (2023). Retrieved from https://culture.ec.europa.eu/creative-europe/about-the-creative-europe-programme
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation. Research Policy.
European Commission. (2023). Creative Europe Programme Dashboard. Retrieved from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/1f107d76-acbe-11eb-9767-01aa75ed71a1
Kotler, P., Kartajaya, H., & Setiawan, I. (2017). Marketing 4.0: Moving from traditional to digital. Wiley.
Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2006). Marketing in the public sector: A roadmap for improved performance. Wharton School Publishing.
KOCCA. (2022). Annual report on digital content in Korea. Korea Creative Content Agency.
McKinsey & Company. (2024). What is digital transformation? Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-explainers/what-is-digital-transformation
Ministry of Culture of Brazil. (2022). Cultura Digital data. Retrieved from https://cultura.gov.br
NEA. (2022). Research & analysis archive. National Endowment for the Arts. Retrieved from https://www.arts.gov/impact/research
Nguyen, L.-K.-N., Kumar, C., Jiang, B., & Zimmermann, N. (2023). Implementation of systems thinking in public policy. Systems, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11010018
OECD iLibrary. (2022). Public spending on culture. Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org
Science Publishing Group. (2022). What is the role of digital storytelling in history? History, 10(1). https://www.sciencepg.com/article/10.11648/j.history.20221001.16
Sprinklr. (2024). The future of social media. Retrieved from https://www.sprinklr.com/blog/future-of-social-media
Swedish Agency for Cultural Policy Analysis. (2020). Official reports. Retrieved from https://kulturanalys.se
UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (n.d.). Culture and creative sector indicators. Retrieved from https://uis.unesco.org
Wessel, L., Baiyere, A., Ologeanu-Taddei, R., Cha, J., & Blegind-Jensen, T. (2021). Unpacking the difference between digital transformation and IT-enabled organizational transformation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22(1), 102–129.
Zakonodavchi initsiatyvy ta prohramy rozvytku kultury (Legislative initiatives and culture development programs). (2023). [In Ukrainian]. Retrieved from European Commission & NEA archives.
Zvit Creative Europe Project Results (Creative Europe). (2023). [In Ukrainian]. Retrieved from https://culture.ec.europa.eu/creative-europe/about-the-creative-europe-programme
