Trade Secret Protection in Corporate Information Flows: From “Reasonable Steps” to Evidence-Ready Digital Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36690/2674-5216-2025-4-50-59Keywords:
corporate information flows, trade secrets, reasonable steps, confidentiality governance, lifecycle controls, access management, cloud collaboration, third-party risk, evidence readiness, incident response, enforcement remedies, cybersecurity governanceAbstract
Corporate information flows have become the primary environment in which economically valuable knowledge is created, refined, exchanged, and stored, increasingly via cloud collaboration and multi-platform work practices. As a result, many high-value intangibles are protected less by registration and more by sustained confidentiality governance that can be proven in dispute settings. This article develops an evidence-oriented governance model for protecting trade secrets in corporate information flows by translating legal protectability criteria into lifecycle controls, role responsibilities, and remedy-ready documentation. The study applies doctrinal analysis of trade secret standards under TRIPS and the EU Trade Secrets Directive, complemented by a structured review of governance-oriented guidance on “reasonable steps” and by synthesis with contemporary cybersecurity governance frameworks. We then map legal elements to operational controls, define an evidence readiness pack, and contextualize the model with recent threat and breach-cost statistics. The results show that trade secret enforceability depends on continuity of controls across the information lifecycle, not on isolated legal declarations. The strongest operational posture combines: legal routing and asset tiering, least-privilege access and controlled sharing pathways, third-party boundary controls, and incident-time legal hold and reproducible proof artifacts. Empirical indicators underscore scale pressure: the global average cost of a data breach reached USD 4.88 million in 2024, while compromised credentials remained a major initial access vector in recent breach datasets. Future research should validate sector-specific indicator sets against incident datasets, test which evidence artifacts most influence remedy outcomes, and examine how AI-enabled workflows reshape confidentiality boundaries and “reasonable steps” expectations.
Downloads
References
European Parliament & Council. (2016). Directive (EU) 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/943/oj/eng
European Union Agency for Cybersecurity. (2024). ENISA Threat Landscape 2024. https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/enisa-threat-landscape-2024
IBM Security, & Ponemon Institute. (2024). Cost of a Data Breach Report 2024. https://cdn.table.media/assets/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/30132828/Cost-of-a-Data-Breach-Report-2024.pdf
International Organization for Standardization. (2022). ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection: Information security management systems: Requirements. https://www.iso.org/standard/27001
International Organization for Standardization. (2022). ISO/IEC 27002:2022 Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection: Information security controls. https://www.iso.org/standard/75652.html
National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2024). The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 (NIST CSWP 29). https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.CSWP.29
Shakhatreh, H. (2024). Comparison of Commercial Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in Jordan and the Middle East. Public Administration and Law Review, (2(18), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.36690/2674-5216-2024-2-51-66
Shakhatreh, H. J. M. (2023). Development of E-Commerce within the Framework of Compliance with Financial Law. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 4(51), 429–439. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.4.51.2023.4123
Shakhatreh, H., & Ababneh, E. M. (2023). The main ways of leaking commercial secrets and measures to protect them. Economics, Finance and Management Review, (2), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.36690/2674-5208-2023-2-76-82
Shakhatreh, H.J.M. (2025). Intellectual Property Protection in Corporate Information Flows: Trade Secrets, Digital Risks, and Remedies. In V. Marchenko (Ed.), Intellectual property: protection in modern conditions. 208 p. (pp. 27-43). Scientific Center of Innovative Research. https://doi.org/10.36690/IPP-27-43
Verizon. (2025). 2025 Data Breach Investigations Report. https://www.verizon.com/business/resources/reports/dbir/
Verizon. (2025). Additional 2025 DBIR research on credential stuffing. https://www.verizon.com/business/resources/articles/credential-stuffing-attacks-2025-dbir-research/
World Intellectual Property Organization. (2019). Protecting trade secrets: How organizations can meet the challenge of taking “reasonable steps”. https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-magazine/articles/protecting-trade-secrets-how-organizations-can-meet-the-challenge-of-taking-reasonable-steps-41043
World Trade Organization. (1994). Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement), Article 39: Protection of undisclosed information. https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/27-trips_04d_e.htm
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.