Submissions

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.

• Title
  The title of the manuscript should fully reflect the topic of the research and its content. It must be short and concrete (not more than 15 words). Besides it should catch the reader’s interest and it should be written using the scientific style. It is appropriate to point the object of research or concretize it using the colon or the brackets. It is not recommended to use contractions, but if used, then only for the commonly known ones.
• Author (authors)
  Here the name (first name and last name) of the author (authors) must be written. Those authors who use the patronymic or middle name should write only the first. The authors whose names are written in the Cyrillic alphabet must transliterate them correctly..
  After the names of the authors, there should be written their academic degree and academic rank, affiliation (university, academic institution, etc. or the organization to which they belong), city and country. If the name of city or country is already used as author's affiliation still both the city and the country should be indicated. The name of the organization or the institution must be indicated, separated by the comma in the nominative case and this name must be full, without contractions and abbreviations. Authors must also indicate their e-mail addresses and the ORCID link.
  If there are several authors, they make a decision themselves concerning the order of their mentioning in the title of the paper (recommended variant – depending on the contribution to the research). The list of authors includes only those persons who have really taken part in the research and agreed to bear full responsibility for its content. Research funding or taking part in paying the article processing charge is not a prerequisite for being included in the list of co-authors. While forming the list of the authors, a special attention should be paid to the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) principles.
  In order to bring the academic degrees, academic ranks and occupations, which are used in some emerging economies or the developing countries, in line with the international standards, the corresponding table should be used ENGLISH EQUIVALENTS FOR ACADEMIC RANKS, DEGREES AND JOB TITLES.
• Abstract
  It should be written using the following algorithm: first two or three sentences indicate the relevance of the topic; the aim and object of the study; the methodology (methods) of the study (for theoretical studies – its theoretical basis) are described; the obtained results and their practical value are characterized. At the same time, every statement must follow logically from the previous one. In the abstract for a research paper, it is recommended to use the numerical results. In the abstract of a review paper, the author can only point the issues discussed, without presenting the results. While writing the abstract, it is necessary to use the active voice instead of the passive voice, and such words as “thus”, “for instance”, “as a result”, etc. In the abstract, the author should not refer to any researches or other sources of information. The abstract should be written without subsections and without subtitles, i.e., is not structured. The text should be concise and original. It is not appropriate to use the sentences in the Abstract from the text of the paper. At the same time, the material which is absent in the paper cannot be presented in the Abstract. In the Abstract, the author should not refer to any sources, use tables and figures. The size of the abstract is 1800-2500 characters with spaces.
• Кeywords
  The purpose of keywords is to provide the insight to the reader into the contents of the paper. They should reflect the area of the research. The number of keywords should be 5-10 in average. There should not be the sentences, but the words or word groups. If the object of the study is not mentioned in the title of the paper (including the country, the region), it should be added to the list of keywords. There is no need to replicate words from the title of the manuscript.
• JEL Classification
  If earlier the author was not aware of this classification system, he/she should attentively look through it in order to have a common understanding of all the areas defined in it . The codes, indicated by the author should clearly reflect the research area. The author is welcome to use the codes from two or three areas, if they are covered in the research.
• Formulas: ___; fig.: ___; tabl. ___; bibl.: ___
• Introduction
  Both scientific issues and the relevance of the research should be substantiated and explained in the introduction. Also a problem statement should be pointed out. The introduction should not be long, the author should avoid using tables and figures.
• Literature Review
  Literature review provides an analysis and generalization of relevant works (papers, monographs, reports, theses, etc.), which describe the essence of the problem and/or give an understanding on the previous efforts to solve it. The Literature Review should comply with the aim of the research (“fitness for purpose”) and represent the results of critical analysis of the analytical base for testing the research hypothesis.
  Literature review must not be limited only by works, which were published in the country where the author lives and works (the problem should be studied globally). Particularly it concerns the authors from non-English speaking countries (they are recommended to thoroughly analyze the works published in English).
  If appropriate, normative legal acts are also analyzed.
  Only those sources are given and analyzed in the paper, which really are valuable for the author’s research. The author cannot just make long lists of authors and their works, which are related to the investigated issues. The author cannot take the pieces of review text from other works with reference to other authors and include their works in the list of references. When citing, the author is obliged to observe ethical and moral principles.
  While making literature review, the author can use own publications and refer to them, but only in order to describe the problem, but not to increase the citation level.
  It is recommended to finish the literature review with the presentation of unsolved issues, identification of contradictions in the results and findings of the previous researches, justification of the need to continue the studies in this area and choice of the specific topic (direction) of this study.
  In the literature review and throughout the text of the paper as a whole, refer to APA formatting and style guide.
• Aims
  The aim describes main results in a short and concrete manner (in one sentence), the achievement of which is the purpose of the research. Here can also be mentioned several intermediate problems, the solution of which will ensure that the aim is achieved. The aim should not replicate the title of the manuscript.
• Methodology
  The methods (methodology) of the study are indicated in this section (commonly known), which author uses in the research, and/or the methodology offered by the author himself is described in a short and concrete manner. If methods and procedures offered are used in other works, the author should refer to the original sources.
  In this subsection of the theoretical paper the theoretical basis of the research should be described, theories, perspectives, formulae, equations should be presented.
  If commonly known statistic procedures are used in the paper, the author should not describe their essence, it is sufficient just to point them.
• Results
  Here empirical or theoretical data obtained in the process of the research are given. It is recommended to use figures, tables, graphs, schemes. The interpretation of the obtained results is not made in this section. Also there should not be presented the results, which were earlier obtained by the authors or other scientists.
• Discussion
  Here the interpretation of the results obtained during the research is made. A comparison is made with the results obtained by other researchers.
• Conclusion
  In this section the main ideas of the manuscript are presented, the obtained results and their novelty are demonstrated. The possibility of practical use of the obtained results should be outlined and the directions for further scientific research should be offered.
• Conflict of Interest
  The author must declare any actual or potential conflict of interest or confirm the absence of conflicts of interest.
  Examples for authors:
  Conflict of interest: The author declares no conflict of interest.
  Conflict of interest: The author declares a potential conflict of interest related to membership in [organization/company].
  Conflict of interest: The author reports that no financial or personal relationships influenced the results of this study.
• Funding.
  The author must indicate the source of funding for the research and publication of the article or confirm the absence of such funding.
  
  Examples for authors:
  Example 1. Funding provided
  The research was conducted with financial support from (indicate the name of the sponsor), project No. XXXXXX. The publication of the article was funded by a grant.
  Example 2. Only the research was funded
  The research was conducted within the framework of a grant project (indicate the name of the project and No. XXXXXX.) The publication of the article was completed without additional funding.
  Example 3. Institutional funding provided
  The research and preparation of the article were funded by the University (indicate the exact name as in the ROR).
  Example 4. No funding
  Funding for the research and publication of the article was not received.
  Example 5. No external support
  The author confirms that the research was conducted and the article was prepared without external financial support.
• Ethics Statement
  The author must provide information on compliance with ethical standards, including approval by an ethics committee where applicable, or confirm that ethical approval was not required.
  Examples for authors:
  Ethics statement: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of [institution], protocol No. XXXXX.
  Ethics statement: All procedures performed in this study complied with institutional and international ethical standards.
  Ethics statement: Ethical approval was not required for this study because it did not involve human participants, animals, or sensitive personal data.
• Generative AI statement. Declaration of Generative AI and AI-Assisted Technologies in the Writing Process
  
  During the preparation of this work, the author(s) used [NAME TOOL / SERVICE] in order to [REASON]. After using this tool/service, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the publication.
  Alternatively, if no artificial intelligence tools were used:
  The author(s) did not use any artificial intelligence tools in the preparation of this work. The author(s) bear full responsibility for the content of the publication.
• Author Contributions
  The author must specify the individual contribution of each author to the research and preparation of the article.
  Examples for authors:
  Author contributions: Author A conceptualized the study, collected data, conducted the analysis, and drafted the manuscript.
  Author contributions: Author A designed the study; Author B performed data analysis; Author C reviewed and edited the manuscript.
  Author contributions: All authors contributed to the study conception, writing, and approval of the final version of the manuscript.
• Acknowledgements
  The author may acknowledge individuals, institutions, or organizations that contributed to the study but do not meet the criteria for authorship, or indicate that there are no acknowledgements.
  Examples for authors:
  Acknowledgements: The author thanks [name/institution] for technical and organizational support.
  Acknowledgements: The authors are grateful to [organization] for консультаційна and methodological assistance.
  Acknowledgements: The author declares that there are no acknowledgements.
• References.
  
  The list of references must be made in the alphabetical order. While indicating the source, which was analyzed in the source language (not in English), it should be indicated first in the source language, then the transliteration should be made in brackets. It is recommended that it should be done with the transliteration for English-speaking systems (it is better to use transliteration of the system British Standards Institution.
  Refer to APA formatting and style guide.