Hybrid Governance of Intellectual Property in the Digital Age: Aligning Law, Platforms, AI, and Blockchain for Effective Protection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36690/2674-5216-2025-4-60-67Keywords:
intellectual property governance, platform accountability, digital evidence, interoperability, cybersecurity, blockchain anchoring, smart contracts, NFT licensing, AI-enabled infringement, provenance, enforcement scalability, hybrid regulationAbstract
Accelerated digitalisation is reshaping how intellectual property is created, exploited, and protected, while exposing the limits of classical doctrines, especially territoriality and conventional enforcement models. Platform markets, data-intensive business models, AI-enabled replication, and distributed technologies amplify cross-border circulation of protected subject matter and increase the evidentiary and cybersecurity burdens placed on rights holders and institutions. The study aims to develop a governance-oriented model of IP protection in the digital environment that integrates legal harmonisation, platform accountability, cybersecurity safeguards, and the conditional use of emerging technologies such as blockchain, smart contracts, and AI-enabled detection. The article applies formal-legal and comparative analysis of European and international instruments, complemented by system-structural mapping of the IP lifecycle to connect platform and AI vulnerabilities with governance controls such as authentication, auditability, interoperability, and remedies.Secondary statistics are used to contextualise scale and enforcement pressure. The results show that the most destabilising effect of digitisation is institutional: disputes increasingly depend on evidence quality, platform procedures, and security posture rather than on doctrinal entitlement alone. Blockchain contributes most reliably when treated as evidentiary and administrative infrastructure, because timestamping and hashing support integrity markers but do not prove authorship or lawful entitlement without identity, provenance, and reproducible verification.NFTs are not rights-transfer mechanisms absent explicit licensing or assignment terms. Effective digital-age IP protection requires a hybrid governance model combining procedural clarity, institution-building, cybersecurity maturity, and carefully scoped technology deployment. Future studies should test admissibility pathways for blockchain-supported evidence, evaluate interoperability designs for registries and platforms, and measure error and remedy performance in automated enforcement pipelines.
Downloads
References
Abbott, R. (2020). The reasonable robot: Artificial intelligence and the law. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/reasonable-robot/
Directive (EU) 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/943/oj
Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/790/oj
Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32001L0029
Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32004L0048
Kilimnik, I. (2025). Contemporary Challenges in Intellectual Property Protection: Legal Transformations and Technological Disruptions. In V. Marchenko (Ed.), Intellectual property: protection in modern conditions. 208 p. (pp. 45-67). Scientific Center of Innovative Research. https://doi.org/10.36690/IPP-45-67
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, & European Union Intellectual Property Office. (2025). Report on counterfeit and pirated trade (estimate for 2021: USD 467 billion; 2.3% of global imports). https://www.euipo.europa.eu/en/news/observatory/euipo-and-oecd-publish-a-report-on-counterfeit-and-pirated-trade
Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market for Digital Services (Digital Services Act). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2022). Intellectual property. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/intellectual-property/
United States Copyright Office. (2024). Non-fungible token study. https://www.copyright.gov/policy/nft-study/
United States Patent and Trademark Office, & United States Copyright Office. (2024). Non-fungible tokens and intellectual property: A report to Congress. https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Joint-USPTO-USCO-Report-on-NFTs-and-Intellectual-Property.pdf
World Intellectual Property Organization. (2021). Blockchain technologies and IP ecosystems (white paper). https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/cws/docs-en-blockchain-for-ip-ecosystem-whitepaper.pdf
World Intellectual Property Organization. (2025). Patents highlights: World Intellectual Property Indicators 2025. https://www.wipo.int/web-publications/world-intellectual-property-indicators-2025-highlights/en/patents-highlights.html
World Intellectual Property Organization. (2025). WIPO IP facts and figures 2025. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo-pub-943-2025-en-wipo-ip-facts-and-figures-2025.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.