Governing Trust in Times of Disruption: Institutional Governance for Civic Resilience

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36690/2674-5216-2026-2-4-14

Keywords:

civic resilience, institutional governance, public trust, civic space, democratic resilience, rule of law, accountability, crisis coordination, information integrity, inclusive participation, institutional learning, social cohesion

Abstract

Civic resilience has become a crucial condition for democratic stability, institutional continuity and social cohesion in times of disruption. Contemporary societies face overlapping challenges, including declining public trust, democratic backsliding, disinformation, social polarisation, climate-related disasters, cyber threats and geopolitical instability. In this context, institutional governance is not limited to administrative crisis management. It also includes the protection of civic space, rights, participation, accountability, information integrity and institutional learning. The objective of this article is to develop a conceptual and analytical framework for institutional governance for civic resilience and to identify the institutional conditions that enable societies to withstand crises while preserving democratic participation, public trust and rights protection. The study applies qualitative conceptual analysis, comparative policy analysis and secondary data interpretation. The research is based on verified international reports, governance indicators and policy documents produced by the OECD, European Commission, World Bank, UNDRR, Freedom House, V-Dem Institute, International IDEA and Edelman Trust Barometer. The article proposes the Institutional Civic Resilience Matrix, which includes seven governance pillars: public trust and legitimacy, civic space, rule of law and accountability, crisis coordination, information integrity, inclusive participation and institutional learning. The results show that civic resilience depends on the interaction between state capacity and civic freedom. Statistical evidence confirms that low institutional trust, restrictions on civil liberties, weak accountability and disinformation significantly reduce the ability of societies to respond collectively to crises. Institutional governance for civic resilience should be understood as a dynamic system that combines competent public administration, democratic safeguards, social inclusion, rights protection and continuous institutional adaptation. Further research should focus on empirical testing of the Institutional Civic Resilience Matrix, comparative assessment of civic resilience across countries, and the impact of digital technologies, artificial intelligence and platform governance on trust, participation and civic agency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Tomasz Gorski, WSHIU Akademia Nauk Stosowanych

WSHIU Academy of Applied Sciences, Poznan

References

Edelman. (2025). 2025 Edelman Trust Barometer: Global report. https://www.edelman.com/trust/2025/trust-barometer

European Commission. (2024). Resilience dashboards. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/strategic-foresight/2020-strategic-foresight-report/resilience-dashboards_en

Freedom House. (2025). Freedom in the World 2025: The uphill battle to safeguard rights. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2025/uphill-battle-safeguard-rights

International IDEA. (2025). The global state of democracy 2025. https://www.idea.int/publications/catalogue/html/global-state-democracy-2025-democracy-move

OECD. (2024a). OECD survey on drivers of trust in public institutions: 2024 results. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-survey-on-drivers-of-trust-in-public-institutions-2024-results_9a20554b-en.html

OECD. (2024b). Practical guide for policymakers on protecting and promoting civic space. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2024/11/practical-guide-for-policymakers-on-protecting-and-promoting-civic-space_4e394a55.html

OECD. (2025a). Protection and promotion of civic space. In Government at a Glance 2025. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2025/06/government-at-a-glance-2025_70e14c6c/full-report/protection-and-promotion-of-civic-space_61c25f94.html

OECD. (2025b). Government at a Glance 2025. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/0efd0bcd-en

UNDRR. (2015). Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. https://www.undrr.org/publication/sendai-framework-disaster-risk-reduction-2015-2030

V-Dem Institute. (2025). Democracy report 2025: 25 years of autocratization. University of Gothenburg. https://www.v-dem.net/documents/60/V-dem-dr__2025_lowres.pdf

World Bank. (2024). Worldwide Governance Indicators. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/worldwide-governance-indicators

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Gorski, T. (2026). Governing Trust in Times of Disruption: Institutional Governance for Civic Resilience. Public Administration and Law Review, (2(26), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.36690/2674-5216-2026-2-4-14

Issue

Section

CHAPTER 1. MODERN TRENDS IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION